FN v. Universiteit Antwerpen: The cold shoulder on the principles of effet utile and pro rata temporis - Ane Aranguiz
This contribution studies the Court's position in the recent judgment FN v. Universiteit Antwerpen (May 2022), dealing with the interpretation of the Framework Agreements on fixed-term and part-time work in higher education. It looks into the four referred questions and provides a critical analysis of its reasoning. It finds, first and foremost, that a poor legal phrasing by the referring court and the lack of substance provided by the claimant weakened the position of the applicant and the possibility of receiving better protection from the directives. Nevertheless, the analysis also finds that the Court failed to see this case in light of important and well-established principles of EU law, particularly regarding the principle of pro rata temporis and effectiveness of EU law. It shows that this (lack of) interpretation by the Court undermines an already flawed protection of the directives and fails to shield a growing group of atypical workers from increasingly precarious labour patterns.