Bio

Frédéric Tomas is a linguist with a Ph.D. in Psychology from the Université de Paris 8. His main focus is on written deception detection, and how auditory cognitive load can help understand the cognitive mechanisms at play during the authorship of deceitful testimonies. Measurements include structural and content-related cues (based on the LIWC software), and behavioral cues (keystroke dynamics).

Courses

Recent publications

  1. A reproduction study of methods for evaluating dialogue system output…

    Braggaar, A., Tomas, F., Blomsma, P., Hommes, S., Braun, N., van Miltenburg, E., van der Lee, C., Goudbeek, M., & Krahmer, E. (2022). A reproduction study of methods for evaluating dialogue system output: Replicating Santhanam and Shaikh (2019). In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Natural Language Generation: Generation Challenges (pp. 86-93). Association for Computational Linguistics. https://aclanthology.org/2022.inlg-genchal.13
  2. Computational Measures of Deceptive Language: Prospects and issues

    Tomas, F., Dodier, O., & Demarchi, S. (2022). Computational Measures of Deceptive Language: Prospects and issues. Frontiers in Communication, 7, [792378].
  3. False Rape Allegation and Regret - A Theoretical Model Based on Cogni…

    Demarchi, S., Tomas, F., & Fanton, L. (2021). False Rape Allegation and Regret: A Theoretical Model Based on Cognitive Dissonance. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 50(5), 2067-2083.
  4. Baselining affects the production of deceptive narratives

    Tomas, F., Dodier, O., & Demarchi, S. (2021). Baselining affects the production of deceptive narratives. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 35(1), 300-307.
  5. Keyboard dynamics discrepancies between baseline and deceptive eyewit…

    Tomas, F., Tsimperidis, I., Demarchi, S., & El Massioui, F. (2021). Keyboard dynamics discrepancies between baseline and deceptive eyewitness narratives. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 35(1), 112-122.

Find an expert or expertise